US Trade Law Architecture
IEEPA, Section 301, and Tariff Mechanisms
The United States has several statutory tools for imposing import duties. Understanding this architecture is important because India's exports face different threats and opportunities under each mechanism. The Supreme Court's ruling on IEEPA narrows one tool but leaves others intact.
- IEEPA (1977): Grants the president emergency economic powers when there is an "unusual and extraordinary threat" with foreign origins. Trump invoked this to impose sweeping global tariffs; the Supreme Court ruled this does not extend to tariff imposition.
- Section 301 (Trade Act of 1974): Allows the US Trade Representative (USTR) to investigate unfair foreign trade practices and impose retaliatory duties — the basis for many China tariffs; remains valid post-ruling.
- Section 201 (Safeguard duties): Global safeguard measures applied to protect domestic industries from import surges — used in the solar panel context under the Biden and Trump administrations.
- CVD and Anti-Dumping (AD) duties: Investigated by the Commerce Department and International Trade Commission (ITC); target subsidised or below-cost imports. The 125.87% CVD on Indian solar panels falls under this category.
- After the ruling: A uniform 10% surcharge was introduced under Section 122 of the Trade Act (balance of payments authority), applicable for 150 days without Congressional approval.
● Tracked since February 21, 2026 · last seen February 25, 2026 · updates as the daily brief publishes
See it in today’s brief.
Daily current affairs with every static concept explained in place.
Read the daily brief