Article 21
Right to Life and Personal Liberty
Article 21 of the Constitution guarantees that no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. Over decades of judicial interpretation, the Supreme Court has expanded Article 21 far beyond its literal text to include a broad cluster of rights intrinsic to human dignity.
- Article 21 is available to all persons (citizens and non-citizens alike), unlike most other fundamental rights.
- Key expansions include: right to health (Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. State of West Bengal, 1996), right to livelihood (Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation, 1985), right to education (later codified in Article 21A by the 86th Amendment, 2002), right to a clean environment (M.C. Mehta v. Union of India series).
- The Jaya Thakur judgment (2026) adds menstrual health and hygiene as a constitutionally enforceable component, moving it from the realm of welfare schemes into a justiciable fundamental right.
- The Court found that menstrual poverty is a structural rights problem: absence of sanitary products and facilities causes girls to drop out of school, constituting a violation of both Article 21 and Article 21A (right to free and compulsory education).
● Tracked since February 03, 2026 · last seen August 14, 2026 · updates as the daily brief publishes
01 Jul '26
No default bail if chargesheet filed but not provided to accused: Supreme Court
Polity & Governance
19 Jun '26
Walking a fundamental right, footpath must for all roads: Supreme Court
Polity & Governance
29 May '26
Right to trauma care of citizens integral part of right to life: Supreme Court
Polity & Governance
17 Mar '26
Supreme Court strikes down age cap on maternity leave for adoptive mothers
Polity & Governance
Plus 1 earlier mentions since February 03, 2026.
See it in today’s brief.
Daily current affairs with every static concept explained in place.
Read the daily brief