Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India (2023)
Supreme Court Judgment on CEC Appointment
Before the 2023 Act, the CEC was appointed by the President on the sole advice of the Prime Minister — there was no statutory or constitutional framework beyond Article 324. In the landmark Anoop Baranwal case, a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court held that until Parliament enacted a law, CEC appointments should be made on the recommendation of a committee comprising the Prime Minister, the Chief Justice of India, and the Leader of the Opposition.
- The Supreme Court judgment came in March 2023 and was unanimous (5-0 bench)
- The Court used the doctrine of constitutional silence: where the Constitution empowers Parliament to act but Parliament has not, the courts can fill the gap to protect constitutional values
- The judgment was immediately superseded by the Chief Election Commissioners Act, 2023 — passed before the first appointment under the court-mandated mechanism could take place
- The 2023 Act excluded the Chief Justice of India from the selection committee (replacing with a Cabinet Minister), drawing criticism that this diluted the independence safeguard the Supreme Court had prescribed
● Tracked since April 19, 2026 · last seen May 15, 2026 · updates as the daily brief publishes
Polity & Governance
Article 324
Polity & Governance
Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023
Polity & Governance
Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023
Polity & Governance
Removal Procedure
Polity & Governance
Article 122
See it in today’s brief.
Daily current affairs with every static concept explained in place.
Read the daily brief