‘One Nation, One Election initiative would fracture country’s federal compact’
A conclave on "One Nation One Election, Federalism and Citizenship" raised concerns that simultaneous elections would structurally undermine India's federal ...
What Happened
- A conclave on "One Nation One Election, Federalism and Citizenship" raised concerns that simultaneous elections would structurally undermine India's federal compact by removing the distinct electoral cycles that currently allow states to hold governments accountable independently of national electoral swings.
- Participants at the conclave also raised concerns over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, the functioning of the Election Commission of India (ECI), and citizenship-related matters.
- Critics argue that ONOE would effectively subjugate state-level democratic accountability to national political rhythms, concentrating electoral power and reducing the federal bargaining capacity of states.
- The Constitution (129th Amendment) Bill, 2024 — which proposes simultaneous elections — was referred to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) in December 2024 and remains under deliberation.
Static Topic Bridges
One Nation One Election (ONOE) — Constitutional Mechanism
ONOE refers to the synchronization of Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assembly elections so they occur simultaneously or within a defined window. Historically, India did hold simultaneous elections from 1952 to 1967, but the cycle broke due to premature dissolutions of assemblies. The Ram Nath Kovind High-Level Committee (constituted September 2023, report submitted March 2024) recommended a two-phase approach: first synchronize Lok Sabha + State Assembly elections, then hold local body (panchayat/municipality) elections within 100 days.
- Constitution (129th Amendment) Bill, 2024: introduced in Lok Sabha on December 17, 2024; referred to JPC on December 19, 2024
- Proposes amending Article 83 (duration of Houses of Parliament) and Article 172 (duration of State Legislatures) to define a "full term"
- Inserts new Article 82A: empowers the President to designate an "Appointed Date" from which simultaneous election cycles begin
- State assemblies elected after the Appointed Date would serve only for the remaining period until the next simultaneous election, not a full five-year term
- Ratification by states is not required for Articles 83 and 172 amendments (simple majority + special majority suffices); however, Amendment to Article 368 provisions for state list subjects would require ratification
- Kovind Committee report: 18,000 pages; submitted to President Draupadi Murmu on March 14, 2024
Connection to this news: The conclave's concern focuses precisely on the truncation of state assembly terms under Article 82A — states elected mid-cycle would lose years of their mandate, directly eroding the autonomy granted to them under the federal scheme.
Indian Federalism — Constitutional Basis and Federal Compact
India follows a quasi-federal structure — federal in form but with a unitary bias (K.C. Wheare's characterisation). The Constitution distributes legislative powers through the Seventh Schedule: List I (Union), List II (State), List III (Concurrent). Article 246 gives Parliament power over Union List, states over State List, and concurrent powers to both. Key federal safeguards include: Article 356 (President's Rule — checked by the 44th Amendment, 1978, requiring Parliamentary approval), Article 263 (Inter-State Council), and Finance Commission (Article 280) for fiscal federalism.
- SR Bommai v. Union of India (1994): Supreme Court held that the floor of the House, not the Governor, is the proper forum to test majority; curtailed arbitrary use of Article 356
- S.R. Bommai case (1994) established that the Constitution is federal in character and states are not mere appendages of the Centre
- Article 368: Amendment procedure — some provisions require a special majority (2/3 of members present and voting + majority of total membership) and ratification by at least half the state legislatures
- Temporal federalism: scholars argue that staggered state election cycles are themselves a federal feature — they allow voters to send differentiated mandates to state vs. central governments
Connection to this news: The conclave's "fracture of the federal compact" argument rests on the constitutional principle that states derive their democratic legitimacy independently — synchronizing elections threatens this by making state mandates hostage to national political waves (coattail effects).
Election Commission of India (ECI) — Powers and Autonomy
The ECI is a constitutional body under Article 324, which vests superintendence, direction, and control of elections in the Commission. It is independent of the executive. The Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners are appointed by the President; the CEC can only be removed by a process akin to removal of a Supreme Court judge (impeachment — Article 324(5)).
- Article 324: Constitutional basis for ECI
- Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023: Changed the appointment process — a selection committee now comprises the PM, Leader of Opposition, and a Union Cabinet Minister (replacing the earlier convention where the CJI was part of the committee)
- The 2023 Act was challenged in the Supreme Court; the court upheld it while observing the need for stronger safeguards
- Under ONOE, ECI's logistical burden would be significantly compressed — requiring massive deployment of EVMs, VVPATs, and security forces in a single window
Connection to this news: The conclave raised concerns about ECI's institutional functioning, particularly the 2023 change in appointment process that critics argue reduces the Commission's independence from the executive.
Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Electoral Rolls
SIR is a periodic exercise conducted by the ECI to update electoral rolls comprehensively — adding new eligible voters, removing deceased/shifted voters, and correcting errors. It is more exhaustive than Summary Revision (which only updates based on applications) and involves booth-level officers visiting households. Critics have raised concerns that SIR exercises, if conducted irregularly or in politically sensitive periods, can affect voter roll accuracy and disenfranchisement risks for marginalized communities.
- Electoral roll revisions are governed by the Representation of the People Act, 1950 (Part III — preparation/revision of rolls)
- SIR is conducted in connection with the qualifying date (January 1 each year for most states)
- The ECI issued Model Code of Conduct provisions to ensure SIR is not used as a political tool
Connection to this news: The conclave flagged SIR alongside ONOE and citizenship concerns as a cluster of issues affecting the integrity of voter participation — particularly the risk that rushed or opaque roll revisions could disenfranchise voters ahead of synchronized elections.
Key Facts & Data
- Constitution (129th Amendment) Bill, 2024: introduced December 17, 2024; referred to JPC December 19, 2024
- Kovind High-Level Committee: constituted September 2, 2023; report submitted March 14, 2024 (18,000 pages)
- Articles amended by the Bill: Article 83, Article 172; new Article 82A inserted
- Simultaneous elections last held in India: 1967 (cycle broke with mid-term dissolutions)
- Article 324: Constitutional basis for ECI
- SR Bommai v. Union of India (1994): landmark Supreme Court case on federal structure and Article 356
- ECI appointment law: Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023
- Local body elections under ONOE proposal: within 100 days of Lok Sabha + State Assembly elections