Mineral Area Development Authority v. Steel Authority of India (2024)
In July 2024, a nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court ruled by an 8:1 majority that royalty paid under the MMDR Act, 1957 is a contractual payment by a mining lessee to the lessor for the right to extract minerals, and is not a "tax." This meant states retain the power under Entry 50 (State List) to impose their own taxes on mineral rights and mineral-bearing land, separate from the royalty payable to the Union-notified scheme. The ruling overruled the seven-judge bench decision in India Cement Ltd. v. State of Tamil Nadu (1990), which had held royalty to be a tax and denied states this taxing power.
- Decided 25 July 2024; majority 8:1; Justice B.V. Nagarathna delivered the sole dissent, warning that letting states tax freely could trigger a "race to the bottom" in mineral-rich regions competing for investment.
- A follow-up order made the ruling retrospectively applicable from 1 April 2005, with any resulting tax dues payable in staggered instalments (no penalty or interest) starting 1 April 2026.
- The judgment interpreted Entries 50 and 54 as distinct from generic taxation entries, reaffirming that regulatory entries cannot be read to include fiscal powers.
● Tracked since August 23, 2026 · last seen September 20, 2026 · updates as the daily brief publishes
See it in today’s brief.
Daily current affairs with every static concept explained in place.
Read the daily brief