Cooperative Federalism vs. Competitive Federalism
India's Constitution creates a "union of states" with a strong Centre, but fiscal arrangements are meant to be cooperative. Cooperative federalism — where Centre and states work as partners — was a key theme of NITI Aayog's early years (replacing the Planning Commission in 2015). However, fiscal tensions have persisted over: (1) the Centre's declining share of CSS funds passed to states; (2) the growing cess and surcharge pool (not shared with states); (3) delays in releasing Finance Commission grants; and (4) conditions attached to CSS that reduce state fiscal autonomy. The GST Council — a constitutional body under Article 279A — is meant to be a collaborative forum for indirect tax decisions, but rate changes decided there affect state revenues directly.
- Article 263: Inter-State Council for coordination — rarely convened
- Article 279A: GST Council — all states and Centre; decisions by 3/4 majority
- NITI Aayog replaced Planning Commission in 2015 — removed discretionary plan grants
- CSS rationalisation: 28 core CSS identified; states bear 40% cost for most
- Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act, 2003: applies to both Centre and states (state FRBMs); caps fiscal deficit at 3% of GSDP
● Tracked since March 08, 2026 · last seen June 10, 2026 · updates as the daily brief publishes